Complete coverage of North Carolina Tar Heels Business & Administration.
Former NCAA infractions chair cautions against rash conclusions in UNC case
Tom Yeager doesn't know and declines to speculate why the NCAA's amended notice of allegations against North Carolina doesn't mention football and men's basketball. But he doesn't believe the jarring change precludes major sanctions against those programs. "Simply because women's basketball is the only one named, I'm not so sure everyone else is out of the weeds."
Audio: David Glenn separates fact from fiction in UNC’s case with the NCAA
When North Carolina received and released its amended notice of allegations from the NCAA on Monday, it wasn’t long before social media outlets were flooded with angry commentary. Through all of the outrage, one particular “explanation” seemed to pop up more often than others. The NCAA cashes in on college basketball, and that’s why it won’t punish a big-name program like North Carolina.
Faculty Athletics Committee discusses new athletic facilities
At the Faculty Athletics Committee meeting Tuesday, committee members were quick to point out flaws in possible plans for new athletic facilities. Mike Bunting, associate athletic director of facility planning and management, said Campus Recreation identified a need for up to 30 acres of field space to support their program.
Audio: Jay Bilas - NCAA enforcement division has "very little they can do with regard to UNC"
ESPN college basketball analyst, Jay Bilas, joins Adam Gold and Joe Ovies to talk about the new notice of allegations given to UNC this week.
Additional Thoughts on UNC's Amended NOA
UNC received an amended Notice of Allegations from the NCAA on Monday and with it came a few significant changes from last year's NOA. The most prominent of those changes was the removal of the allegations regarding impermissible benefits regarding the AFAM classes, the removal of men's basketball and football and reducing the time frame to just six years. What does it all mean?
North Carolina now on clock to respond in NCAA academic case
North Carolina is preparing for the next step toward a long-awaited resolution in the multi-year case centered around its academic fraud scandal. The school and individuals named for violations have 90 days to respond now that they finally know what NCAA charges they face. It's the next procedural deadline, though not one set in stone.
As wasn’t predicted, the worst isn’t coming to UNC
The Raleigh newspaper in unprecedented coverage fanned the flames, the national media parroted along, and the masses declared that the appropriate punishments would be that coaches should be fired, banners brought down, scholarships forfeited, post-season bans imposed, heavy fines levied — and, for some, the death penalty for the “worst athletic scandal in the history of the NCAA.”
As the year ends, Folt looks to the future
Chancellor Carol Folt said she and her team didn’t know the exact legal implications of House Bill 2 when it was passed. “Some people think it means one thing legally, other people think it means others and that’s going to be the ground of lawsuits going forward, it’s what does it really mean,” Folt said in an end-of-year interview.
Audio: David Glenn on two reasons why the UNC case is a bad fit for the NCAA
Compared to the notice of allegations handed down to North Carolina by the NCAA last May, the document the school received on Monday was slightly watered down. While the university is still facing five Level I violations and continues to sit under a cloud of uncertainty, the amended NOA was a clear sign that UNC’s attorneys were successful in disputing some of the original charges.
UNC Chancellor Addresses Amended Notice of Allegations
UNC Chancellor Carol Folt said the university is “pleased to have” the amended Notice of Allegations from the NCAA. The amended allegations came in to the university on Monday morning and were released to the public later that afternoon. Folt, speaking at the WCHL Community Forum on Tuesday, said that the university is ready to move forward.
National perspective on UNC amended allegations focused on basketball
UNC released the NCAA's amended notice of allegations on Monday, jump-starting a case that has been stalled in procedural limbo since August. Given how consistent the NCAA is in their inconsistency, this only makes it more difficult to predict possible punishment based on precedent. Regardless, national pundits did their best to interpret the release of amended allegations.
UNC's NOA Shifts Blame Away From Academic Support Counselors
The NCAA softened its stance on the role that ASPSA counselors played in the AFAM scandal in its amended notice of allegations to the University of North Carolina on Monday. In the initial notice delivered last May, ASPSA counselors were alleged to have provided impermissible benefits to student-athletes in African and Afro-American Studies courses from 2002-2011 by way of special arrangements with faculty and staff.
Catfishing the Banner Chasers
In the course of just over two weeks, an anonymous person tweeting from a brand new, unverified Twitter account, worked his way into the inner circle of those at the center of trying to bring UNC down based on little more than an apparent knowledge of NCAA bylaws and speaking the language a certain group of rabid fans wanted to hear.
UNC's Amended NOA Better Aligns with Bylaws
Without evidence to suggest the counselors’ complicity in the AFAM paper courses, the NCAA’s allegation was not based on a specific bylaw. On Monday, that revelation was evident in the removal of the original first allegation of impermissible benefits. It was replaced by a failure to monitor charge relating to ASPSA and the AFAM department.
UNC AD Bubba Cunningham teleconference notes
UNC AD Bubba Cunningham did not want to speculate on potential sanctions. UNC men's basketball and football were not mentioned in the new Notice of Allegations, but Cunningham would not comment on whether that made him more confident that those programs were safe. UNC has 90 days to respond to the NOA.