Menu

Another way at UNC


The eight-month investigation by Kenneth Wainstein found, as did seven previous investigations, that the bogus courses were not created to keep athletes eligible, and that coaches at UNC did not steer athletes in need of a parachute toward those classes — a narrative that has been pushed by major media in this state, both implicitly and explicitly. That doesn’t allow UNC athletics to wiggle of the hook. (The Robesonian)

Related:

Connections in UNC vs. Michigan State NCAA Tournament game go straight to the top
Saturday’s round-two matchup between basketball powerhouses North Carolina and Michigan State could be described as the "Kevin Guskiewicz game." Guskiewicz started his new role in...

UNC BOT Chair Calls for ACC Transparency
With two ACC schools electing to sue the ACC pertaining to the grant of rights, speculation has turned to UNC’s next steps and if Clemson’s...

Bubba Cunningham Taking Measured Approach for UNC as National Landscape Shifts
One prominent line of thinking is that UNC needs to jump ship to the SEC or Big Ten before the financial disparity becomes detrimental. UNC...

UNC Athletics Financial Report Breakdown and Discussion
UNC's athletic department reported a record $139.4 million in operating revenue during the 2022-23 fiscal year, which represents a 13.7% increase year-over-year. The school’s annual...


© 2005-2024 Tar Heel Times | Contact | Privacy Policy | Site Map | RSS | Did UNC Win?

Tar Heel Times is an unofficial resource for UNC fans and is not affiliated with the University of North Carolina.